Alberta Joins Fed. Anti-Lubicon Campaign (9k)

Roland Leitner (leitner@lion.hsc.ucalgary.ca)
Tue, 3 Dec 1991 06:48:19 MST


Lubicon Lake Indian Nation
Little Buffalo Lake, AB
403-629-3945
FAX: 403-629-3939

Mailing address:
3536 - 106 Street
Edmonton, AB T6J 1A4
403-436-5652
FAX: 403-437-0719

November 28, 1991

On November 26th Lubicon Advisor Fred Lennarson received a phone call from
a reporter named Richard Helm asking for reaction to comments by Provincial
Native Affairs Minister Dick Fowler. Mr. Helm is the legislative reporter
for the Edmonton Journal. Mr. Fowler's remarks were obviously calculated
to reinforce and support the Federal Government's new anti-Lubicon
campaign.

Repeating Mr. Siddon's demonstrably inaccurate recent statements to the
Editorial Board of the Edmonton Journal, Mr. Fowler told Mr. Helm that the
Lubicons had been "offered as much or more than the others". Obviously
seeking to counter widespread criticism of the contrived Woodland Cree
settlement, Mr. Fowler claimed "the others had freely agreed".
Paraphrasing comments recently attributed to unnamed Treaty 8 Chiefs by
Journal reporter Jack Danylchuk, Mr. Fowler falsely charged that Lubicon
Chief Bernard Ominayak "is preventing his people from settling". Echoing
Mr. Siddon's deceitful November 4th letter to the Editor of the Edmonton
Journal, Mr. Fowler claimed "the Chief has refused repeated requests to
meet". And demonstrating anew that racism and political sleaze aren't the
exclusive domain of Federal Government politicians, Mr. Fowler claimed that
Chief Ominayak's refusal to knuckle under to the Federal Government's so-
called "take-it-or-leave-it" offer was due to bad advice from white advisor
Lennarson who "is living well while the Lubicon people live in poverty".

Excepting only Mr. Fowler's use of sleazy, racist insinuations and innuendo
which Mr. Lennarson refused to dignify with a response, Mr. Lennarson told
Mr. Helm that the facts speak for themselves. He pointed out that even
Alberta Premier Getty had characterized the so-called "take-it-or-leave-it"
offer as "deficient" in the area of providing the Lubicon people with any
hope of once again becoming economically self-sufficient. He offered to
send Mr. Helm information comparing recent settlement agreements, a copy of
the Federal Government's so-called "take-it-or-leave-it" offer, a copy of
Provincial Government proposals for supposedly fixing the so-called Federal
"offer" and a copy of the draft settlement agreement prepared by the
Lubicon people so that Mr. Helm could read them all and judge for himself.
As for Mr. Fowler's charges that Chief Ominayak was preventing settlement
and refusing to meet, Mr. Lennarson said that the Chief had just walked in
the door and could speak for himself.

Mr. Helm asked for copies of the proffered materials and also to speak to
Chief Ominayak, which he then did -- producing the attached article and
editorial.

At this stage there can be no doubt that the Federal and Provincial
Governments are cooperating in a major new anti-Lubicon propaganda campaign
which includes use of so-called "good Indians" and personal attacks on
Chief Ominayak. There's also little doubt that this major new anti-Lubicon
campaign has been inspired by the increasingly effective effort to block
Daishowa from clear-cutting Lubicon trees prior to a settlement of Lubicon
land rights, and, to a lesser extent, by anticipated negative publicity
over Government handling of the Lubicon situation expected to result from
the new Goddard book on the Lubicons.

Overt personal attacks on Chief Ominayak are new and are likely designed to
try and undermine the Chief's well deserved reputation for sincerity and
integrity. Credibility is terribly important when somebody is obviously
lying. Messrs. Siddon and Fowler have of course little hope of ever
matching Chief Ominayak's credibility; hence, Government propagandists are
seeking to bring the Chief down to the Government's level of public
disrepute in order to try and blur the issues, becloud their own
malevolence and thereby blunt growing public pressure for a just and
honourable settlement of Lubicon land rights.

* * * * *

Attachment #1: THE EDMONTON JOURNAL, Wednesday, November 27, 1991

CHIEF, ADVISERS BLOCKING LUBICON DEAL -- FOWLER

Richard Helm
Journal Staff Writer

Lubicon Chief Bernard Ominayak and his advisers are to blame for blocking a
long-sought settlement to the northern Alberta band's land claim, says
Native Affairs Minister Dick Fowler.

"The chief of the Lubicons continues to prevent his people from receiving
the benefits of a settlement which in my view insofar as land is concerned
is very, very generous," Fowler said Tuesday.

Fowler's remarks, which came in an interview with Standard Broadcast News,
drew a stinging response from the band leadership.

Ominayak accused Fowler of attempting to divert public attention from the
provincial government's historic role in driving the Lubicons into poverty.

Fred Lennarson, a band adviser, called Fowler a liar.

Fowler said he has grown frustrated with the stalemated land claim and its
"peculiar nuances," and maintains the Lubicons have been offered a more
handsome settlement than any other Alberta band.

He questioned the advice Ominayak has been receiving in rejecting that
federal offer.

"If he was getting good advice I think the thing would have been settled an
awful long time ago," Fowler said.

"For whatever reason those people that are giving him advice continue to
live in absolute and total comfort at what I would presume to be very
healthy incomes...while the Lubicon people that live in the area and are
members of the band continue to suffer all the pains of poverty."

Federal Indian Affairs Minister Tom Siddon desires a settlement "but for
reasons that aren't completely clear to Ottawa or to me we just don't seem
to be able to arrive at that settlement on a basis that every other band
had settled on in this province," Fowler said.

Ominayak rejected Fowler's comments.

And he denied that he has refused to meet with the minister.

"It's true we don't have very many luxuries in the community at this
point," Ominayak said in an interview.

"It's unfortunate that people like Fowler are making these accusations when
they are the ones that made every effort to put our people in the situation
that they're in."

The Lubicons have estimated as much as $7 billion in resources have been
reaped from their lands by both the federal and provincial governments.

The Lubicons have demanded compensation for the riches drawn from their
land as well as recognition of their aboriginal rights to territory they
insist they have never surrendered.

The value of their claim has been estimated at about $170 million.

Ottawa has countered with a $45 million settlement offer and a reserve of
246 sq. km, or about 48 hectares per person of reserve land.

Lennarson said Fowler's suggestion that the Lubicon settlement offer
outshines all others is "nonsense."

Even Premier Don Getty has described the federal offer as deficient, he
said.

"I presume Mr. Fowler knows better and is just lying as part of the current
anti-Lubicon propaganda campaign which I think is being stimulated by the
Lubicons blocking Daishowa from coming in and taking their trees, on top of
everything else."

The band's position is "a kind of minimalist position" for the Lubicon
people to try and rebuild their society from the ground up, Lennarson said.

The Lubicons openly question the criteria used in measuring the federal
settlement offer against others accepted by other bands. All other recent
settlements in Alberta have been outstanding treaty land entitlements under
a treaty to which the Lubicons are not a party, Lennarson noted.

* * * * *

Attachment #2: THE EDMONTON JOURNAL, Friday, November 29, 1991

EDITORIALS
ON WHOM THE BLAME FALLS

It is offensive to hear Native Affairs Minister Dick Fowler blaming the
Lubicon Lake Cree for their own poverty.

Every man, woman and child in Little Buffalo would be wealthy today if the
band had owned mineral rights in part of its traditional hunting and
trapping area, and had collected the energy royalties that flowed
continuously into the coffers of the province of Alberta through the 1970s
and 1980s.

Even without mineral rights, the Lubicon people could have made a decent
living through the same period if the Alberta government had moved
forcefully to protect their trapping area from overzealous energy
exploration crews.

This did not happen. Instead, the Alberta government extracted millions of
dollars in royalties from the northern wilderness between the Peace and
Athabasca rivers for two decades and returned almost none of the wealth to
the original inhabitants of seven isolated communities. Until 1988, the
province did everything it possibly could to undermine the legitimate
Lubicon claim.

Fowler is free to blame Chief Bernard Ominayak for refusing Ottawa's "very,
very generous" land claim settlement although the $45-million package is
insufficient to build a self-supporting community from the ground up. But
the minister can't deny one painful truth: The Lubicon Lake Cree are poor
because the Alberta government made them poor.