Black Hills and Stone Boy:A New Interpretation (Some Notes)

(no name) ((no email))
Sat, 4 Sep 1993 20:58:31 GMT


SOME NOTES

{the footnote signifiers did not show up, so please excuse the
confusion}
{the original was in Microsoft Word}

Elaine Jahner. "Cognitive Style in Oral Literature", class handout.
Page 34.

Charlotte Black Elk. _Sioux Nation Black Hills Act: Hearing Before
the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs United States Senate
Ninety-ninth Congress Second Session on S. 1453, July 16, 1986,
Washington, DC_. Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986.
Page 204.

Thomas E. Mails. _Fools Crow_. Garden City, New York:Doubleday &
Co., Inc., 1979. Pages 13-14, quoted from the January 1909 issue of
_HamptonUs Broadway_.

Quoted from James Michenor's _Centennial_, page 149, Elizabeth
Cook-Lynn speech for "The Centennial West, a 1989 symposium" sponsored
by the Montana State Historical Society, reprinted in _Wicazo Sa
Review_, Vol. VI, No. 2, page 44.

David B. Miller. "Historian's View of S. 705-The Sioux Nation Black
Hills Bill", _Wicazo Sa Review_. Spring 1988, Vol. IV, No. 1, page
55-56.

James Walker. _Lakota Myth_. Elaine Jahner, ed. Lincoln,
Nebraska:University of Nebraska Press, 1983.

Mails, Thomas. Ibid., Footnote 6, p. 237.

Elaine Jahner. Ibid., p. 34.

Black Elk, Charlotte. Ibid., page 200.

Having placed it after "The Cleansing", the reiteration of the
creation of the family (the adoption process described in the other
versions cited) and thus the world to a kinship-oriented Lakota people,
is unnecessary.

Black Elk, Charlotte. Ibid., page 214.

---
Jacqueline.F.Keeler@Dartmouth.edu