Mabo made understandable

b.schneider@oln.comlink.apc.org
Thu, 14 Oct 1993 14:14:00 PDT


## Nachricht vom 11.10.93 weitergeleitet
## Ursprung : /APC/GREENLEFT/NEWS
## Ersteller: greenleft@peg.UUCP

Mabo made understandable

Mabo - its meaning for Australia
A Community Aid Abroad Background Report
30 pp. $8 (plus $2 for postage and packaging)
Reviewed by Lachlan Anderson

Community Aid Abroad recently released a compilation of essays written from
a legal and historical point of view. The 28-page pamphlet goes through the
full implications of the Mabo judgment in an easily understood way.

Henry Reynolds, a historian at James Cook University, takes us back to when
he was discussing Murray Island with Eddie Mabo before the celebrated Mabo
case began. Eddie was a gardener at the university. He mentioned to Eddie
that, even though his people had lived on the island both before and after
white settlement, the land officially belonged to the government.

``I still remember the look that came over his face - it was a look of
incredulity; how could anyone be so mistaken about the land not belonging to
his family?''

Reynolds makes some interesting comparisons between the Mabo decision and
similar proceedings that have taken place in Canada, New Zealand and the US.
However, ``native title'' was recognised as far back as 1756 in Canada.

The pamphlet also looks at what legal power state governments have in
overriding Mabo (constitutionally none) and how compensation is to be
assessed for land taken away after 1975, when the Racial Discrimination Act
was passed. It is this point that greatly concerns mining companies and
pastoralists who may have to pay compensation.

It will also mean going through a minefield of legal uncertainty and
complexity. In the 1930s, when the US legal system reached this point of
indigenous rights recognition, it set up the Indian Claims Commission, which
sat for 30 years and looked at more than 500 cases.

Among questions raised in the text are: how secure is the Mabo judgment?
could it be overturned? Reynolds says that power lies solely with the High
Court, and at present the staff of the court are relatively young and open
minded to rights of indigenous people - clearly shown by the six to one
decision in favour of Mabo.
The Mabo decision is one that concerns many sectors of the community. This
pamphlet is enlightening reading for everyone.

## CrossPoint v2.1 ##