A DELEGATION OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE WESTERN SHOSHONES OF
NEVADA,UTAH,CALIFORNIA,AND IDAHO,THE TEMAGAMIS AND CHIPPEWAS
OF ONTARIO,THE LIL'WATS,HAIDAS,AND OKANAGAN-SHUSWAPS OF B.C.,
THE PLAINS CREE OF SASKATCHEWAN,AND THE INNU OF QUEBEC, WILL
BE ATTENDING WITH NATIVE RIGHTS LAWYER DR. BRUCE CLARK FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PUTTING THE ISSUE OF NATIVE SOVEREIGNTY BEFORE THE
INTERNATIONAL LAW COURT KNOWN AS THE PRIVY COUNCIL OF GREAT
BRITAIN.
IN 1773 THAT SAME COURT DECIDED THAT THE NON-NATIVE COURTS OF
WHAT IS NOW CANADA AND THE US HAVE NO JURISDICTION TO RESOLVE
TREATY DISPUTES BETWEEN NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SOCIETY
(Mohegan Indians v Conneticut)
THAT LAW HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED.IN PRACTICE HOWEVER,THE NON-
NATIVE COURTS HAVE ASSUMED THE VERY JURISDICTION AS THAT
PRECLUDED BY THE PRIVY COUNCIL'S DECISION.IN CONSEQUENCE WE
ARE FACING A SERIES OF DECISIONS,WHICH THOUGH TECHNICALLY VOID
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION,ARE RESULTING IN THE LOSS OF LIBERTY
BOTH OF MANY NATIVE PERSONS AND ALSO OF ENVIRONMENTALISTS WHO
OPPOSE THE DESTRUCTION BY CLEAR-CUTTING OF THE INDIAN
TERRITORIES.THE PURPOSE OF THE ENTOURAGE WILL BE TO PERSUADE THE
PRIVY COUNCIL TO SAY WHETHER ITS DECISION REMAINS GOOD LAW.
THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR DENYING THIS.
EXISTING LAW IN LEGAL THEORY PRECLUDES USURPATION,BUT THE WHITE
LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT'S EXISTING USURPATION IN PRACTICE PRECLUDES
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXISTING LAW.THE USURPATION HAS BEEN AND
CONTINUES TO BE CRIMINAL.
SOVEREIGNTISTS LIKE THE LIL'WAT AND QWA-BA-DIWA ARE HOPEFUL THAT
A PRIVY COUNCIL RULING IN THEIR FAVOUR WOULD END THE ECOCIDE,AND
AVERT THE JURISDICTIONAL SURRENDER OF MUCH OF BC UPON THE BASIS
OF A FRAUDULENT,TREASONABLE AND GENOCIDAL MISREPRESENTATION OF
EXISTING SETTLED AND BINDING INTERNATIONAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW.
THE LIL'WAT "QUEST FOR JUSTICE" REQUIRES FUNDS FROM EACH AND
EVERYONE TO HELP US REACH OUR GOAL AND DESTINATION BY NOVEMBER
14. cheques to "LIL'WAT DEFENCE" c/o LIL'WAT ESTKEN PO BOX 208
MT CURRY BC CANADA, VON2K0. info: CHUBB PASCAL (604) 894-6640
phone/fa