While the Pamunkey are not federally recognized, they have still had to
deal with the Congress for some purposes. When they sought to settle a
land claim involving a disputed railroad right of way running through
their lands, they had to seek Congressional approval for the settlement in
the early 1980s because the federal statutory restrain on Indian lands
applies to ALL Indian tribes in the United States, not just those that are
federally recognized.
I frequently use the Pamunkey in my Indian law class as an example of a
state, but not federally, recognized tribe that has an important history
that informs our understanding of both what an Indian tribe is as a matter
of law and also informs our understanding of our own constitutional
documents.
Hope this helps.
*****************************************************************************
Robert N. Clinton
Wiley B. Rutledge Professor of Law
Associate Justice, Court of Appeals of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
*****************************************************************************
University of Iowa College of Law * The views stated in this message are
Boyd Law Building * solely those of the author and do not
Iowa City, IA 52242 * reflect the position of any institution
* or government by which he is employed.
rclinton@uiowa.edu ******************************************
* SYSOP of the IOWA INDIAN DEFENSE NETWORK
(319) 335-9032 (voice) * A Computer Board for Indian Rights
(319) 335-9019 (FAX) * (319) 335-9838 (data -- 9600,N,8,1)
*******************************************************************************