Re: Copyright, Clarification of Previous Post

Catherine Lavender (frontera@ucsu.colorado.edu)
Sun, 23 Jul 1995 23:02:23 -0600


I just wanted to make it clear that the analysis of copyright law I sent
Gary was meant to be a private note to him from myself, and was not
written or intended for public reposting.

I use two names as hypothetical people, Pamela and Tom. I did this merely
to make the discussion between Gary and myself clearer, not to imply that
any person had in fact argued what I attribute as hypotheticals in the
explanation. I guess what I mean is this: any resemblance to persons
living or dead is unintentional.

Hope I didn't offend or confuse anyone.

Sincerely,

Cathy

[ It's more than a bit ironic that in my zeal to learn about what can
be copied legally I've made a mistake in a judgement in copying text
from messages sent to me personally, even though I removed identifying
information. I'll try to be more careful in future. --Gary ]