INFORMATION UPDATE
19 February 1997
LITTLE PROGRESS IN THE RECOGNITION AND DEMARCATION OF INDIGENOUS LANDS IN GUYANA
The Government of Guyana recently approved its budget for 1997. Included
therein is 50 million Guyana Dollars (approximately 365,000 US Dollars)
for the demaraction of titled Indigenous territory. This amount may be
sufficent to demarcate 2 or 3 titled areas, assuming that non-essential
overhead costs are minimized. The World Bank has offered a further
US200,000 for demarcation and is prepared to make aditional financing
available. However, the Government of Guyana has failed to respond to the
offer, raising serious questions about their willingness to legally
recognize and demarcate Amerindian lands.
Land titling began in Guyana with the passage of the 1977 Amerindian Act.
Certain communities that did not receive titles in 1977, received
recognition in a 1991 Amendment, particularly the Akawaio of the Upper
Mazaruni region whose land was slated for a hydroelectric project at that
time. The 1991 Amendments came during Guyanas last general election.
1997 is also a general election year and Government rhetoric about
Amerindian rights is increasing. The Government views Amerindians, who
comprise about 8% of the population, as an important voting block with the
potential to influence the outcome.
Meanwhile, a substantial number of communities remain without titles to
their ancestral territories and many more complain that the titles that
they do have are inadequate. The latter state that titled areas do not
include all of their ancestral lands and do not correspond to their
traditional territory. Once contiguous Amerindian territories have been
divided up by the Government so that they are now intersected with
so-called 'State-owned' land. Coupled with Government claims to sole
ownership of subsurface minerals, this has faciliatated the entrance of
multinational mining and logging companies and small-scale miners from the
coast and Brazil.
The Government states that it does not give mining or logging concessions
in Amerindian areas, but evidence on the ground indicates otherwise.
Moreover, the vast majority of Amerindian territories have yet to be
physically demarcated creating widespread confusion as to the precise
boundaries of Amerindian areas. Conflicts, occasionally violent, between
communities and miners have resulted.
The entrance of small-scale miners, especially from Brazil, into
Amerindian areas has resulted in a virtual epidemic of malaria and a
predictable list of negative social effects. Alcoholism, prostitution,
drug use and violence are on the increase. Amerindians are also
increasingly participating in the mining industry, most often as low paid
labourers, with the most dangerous jobs. This has also had negative
impacts on community life, especially for Amerindian women who are forced
to fend for themselves in the absence of men. The Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights, in a 1985 decision involving the Yanomami in
Brazil stated that Governments have affirmative legal obligations to take
preventative measures to counteract the impact of small-scale mining on
Indigenous peoples.
The presence of multinational mining and logging companies is also
extremely troubling. These companies are granted concessions without the
knowledge, let alone the participation of affected communities. There is
no mechanism for incorporating Amerindian participation in land use
decisions in Guyana and the Government appears content to routinely ignore
Amerindians in the granting of concessions, even when titled Amerindian
land is involved.
Two mining companies, Golden Star Resources and Broken Hill Property Co.
recently entered into a deal with the Malaysian, Barama Timber Company to
prospect for gold and diamonds in Barama's timber concession. Presumably
one will cut timber while the other explores or mines for minerals.
The OMAI mine disaster, which dumped up to 3 million cubic litres of
cyanide- and heavy metal-laced wastes into the Essequibo river is a
frightening reminder of the consequences of uncontrolled industrial
mining. As the events, both preceding and following the OMAI disaster
indicate, the Guyana Government is either incapable or unwilling to
adequately monitor the activities of industrial mining operations. The
same can also be said for logging operations, which go virtually
unregulated. The World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank are
presently co-financing an Environmental Protection Agency and draft
legislation on the environment has been submitted, but concrete results
have yet to be seen and the Government is attempting to open up more of
the country for resource exploitation.
Amerindian cultural integrity, survival and future development are
inseprably related to their lands. 75 percent of Amerindians in Guyana
are subsistence farmers and hunters; therefore, their physical survival is
also related to the productive capacity of their land, the existence of
habitat for game animals and water quality sufficient to support fish
which is a primary source of protein. The continuing failure to fully
guarantee Amerindian land rights, including the full demarcation of the
boundaries thereof, and the failure to monitor and control the activities
and environmental and social effects of mining and logging operations,
poses a severe threat to the well-being, human rights and continued
survival of Amerindian peoples in Guyana.
For further information please contact:
Forest Peoples Programme
1c, Fosseway Business Centre
Straford Road
Moreton-in-Marsh
GL56 9NQ
England
Ph. 44.1608.652.893
Fax.44.1608.652.878
EMail: wrm@gn.apc.org
Forest Peoples Programme / World Rainforest Movement (UK Office)
1c Fosseway Business Center, Stratford Road, Moreton in Marsh, GL56 9NQ, UK
Tel: 44 (0)i608 652893 Fax: 44 (0) 1608 652878 Email: wrm@gn.apc.org
The World Rainforest Movement's International Secretariat is at:
Casilla de Correo 1539, Montevideo, Uruguay
Tel: 598 2 496192 Fax: 598 2 419222 Email: rcarrere@chasque.apc.org